Ronn Faigen is the General Manager for APMG-US, part of APMG International, a global accreditation and qualifications organization. In this capacity, Ronn is responsible for increasing the awareness and adoption of internationally recognized best practices, among them PRINCE2®, Managing Successful Programs (MSP™) Portfolio, Program and Project Offices (P3O®) and ITIL®. Prior to joining APMG-US, Ronn held a number of executive management positions in technology companies involved in digital imaging, educational software, and high availability clustered computing. Ronn began his career with IBM, where he spent fourteen years in a variety of customer-facing roles.
To quote Abraham Maslow, “It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail.” Is this the current state of affairs in Project Management?
I have to provide full disclosure and confess that I am not a practicing Project Manager. At one point in my peripatetic career, I was an “accidental Project Manager,” one of those duffers who was assigned to manage a multi-million dollar project because I was available. Short of reading parts of the MS Project manual, I have never gone through any formal training. But in my current role, I am connected to Project Managers on a daily basis. I am also involved with a much broader range of disciplines and certifications that extend beyond Project Management. And I am concluding that at the end of the Project Management world, just like the old maps from the Middle Ages, there is a sign reading “Here Be Dragons.”
This is illustrated by a recent experience. I was speaking with a consultant whose firm specializes in Project Management. He was explaining that his client had just secured a contract worth over $200M. He would be working closely with them, creating methodologies, conducting training sessions, and providing Project Management expertise. But the more I explored this opportunity, the more it became apparent that his client had actually landed a $200M Program. While Project Management skills would certainly be required, Program Management skills were probably even a higher priority if the customer wanted to stay off the pages of the Chaos Report. I suggested that perhaps the consultant ought to be looking at bringing in some Program Management training or professionals with Program Management skills. I could almost see his eyes glaze over.
This is not an isolated experience. A very seasoned executive from an internationally recognized research organization recently told me about an experience working with a large government agency who treated everything as a project, no matter how large or how complex. That was because they had invested large sums of money in building Project Management skills and it was through this lens that they were viewing the world. Her conclusion was that the question was when, not if, failure would occur.
Why does Project Management have such an appeal while Program Management or Portfolio Management gets such short shrift? I certainly don’t have the definitive answer, though I do have some hunches. Go to any of the large Project Management training companies and search on Program Management. If you find any offerings, they will be dwarfed by the range of available Project Management offerings. So maybe it is the fault of the training companies for not actively marketing these skills to their corporate customer or students? Or it could be the fault of companies who don’t see the strategic value in having a well functioning Project Office (the first thing that seems to get cut when revenue falls) or in having their executives make the commitment of time and energy that Program Management requires. Or it could be the fault of the individual professional who stops their training after having achieved their project management certification. Is there any data available on this? It would be a fascinating study.
Many large companies understand that there are disciplines beyond Project Management. Not only Program Management, but Portfolio Management, Risk Management, and how to establish a Project Management Office are skills that require training and focus. The real enlightened companies even foster skills in Change Management, an often overlooked component of successful project and program delivery. But the high rate of project failure, even with an ever growing population of trained project managers, perhaps indicates that more companies and more professionals need to expand their horizons.
The French have a term, “déformation professionnelle.” This is the tendency to view things from the vantage point of your profession rather than from a broader perspective. Project Management is a critical skill. No argument. But not everything is a project. Just as everything is not a nail, no matter how skillfully you wield your hammer.
Copyright ©2011 Ronn Faigen
Hello John,
Thanks for the comment. Much appreciated!
I don’t know much about the PgMP, though I was looking at some statistics recently and saw that there were about 400K PMP’s but only about 400 PgMP’s. So that statistic may in itself be making quite a statement.
I also can’t speak to organizational dysfunctions. Your experience here is far greater than mine. One of the things I am learning though is that Project Management is for individuals but Program Management is for organizations. Meaning that it is the organization that needs to understand the importance and value of Program Management and not the Project Manager. Until this is realized within the executive ranks, Projects will take the place of Programs and critical executive sponsorship will be absent.
Again, thanks for adding your insight and experience to the discussion!
Hi Ron…
Great post! We have a few things in common. I also used to work at IBM, where I first became PMP certified. I really enjoyed your post, because it is outside of the box. You’re asking great questions. As a PM, I would have to say that program and portfolio management are a part of the project management domain. PMI, and I think PRINCE2, include this to some extent. PMI, as I’m sure you’re aware, even has a Program Management Certification… although I think they missed the mark on exactly what this should mean. They approach Program Management as Project Management on Steroids.
Having said that, I think you are right on the money. Not enough time is spent on these other areas, and I think that is your point. I teach project management at a local university, and two things I tell all my students is that…
1) If you can’t select the right projects, project management won’t get you anywhere fast.
2) If you can’t manage your portfolio by prioritizing projects and taking on only what the organization can handle, your success rate won’t improve.
I gave a presentation at PMI Global a few years ago, called the Curse of Project Management. The premise was that project failure rates are increasing (Chaos Report) even though project management training and industry commitment to it is also increasing. Something is wrong.
You hit the nail on the head. Project Management, in and of itself, is not going to get us very far. It is dealing with Organizational Dysfunctions that will solve the problem. Why isn’t this happening? Because this deals with changing people… not processes.
All the best!
John
Hello Chris,
I agree with the benefit of “soft” skills, and learning these benefits almost any position where people come together. I would add things like Change Management, Leadership, and Negotiating Skills. However, mastery all of that without a good grasp of best practices in methodologies would also be an impediment to success. As someone who was thrust into a PM role with no PM training, but with significant people management experience, I can attest to this.
Interesting article, as someone who has had both job titles I think you make some very valid points.
Personally I think there is far too much emphasis on methodologies rather than the “soft” skills of people management & getting stuff done.
Good Luck