Too often individuals who are excellent at being individual contributors are moved to management roles within the organization without the person promoting them really knowing if they have the skills to be a manager. Additionally, the individual being promoted is not always given access to training, coaching or a mentor to help them prepare for the new role and the additional responsibilities they must carry as a manager. Some individuals will be high performers in a management role – they just need the support to succeed. Others make it in spite of a lack of support from the company. And, others just aren’t management material or, frankly, have no interest in such a role.
Let’s look at three case studies.
Case Study 1
Sam, a business unit manager of a telecommunications company mentioned to me that he had this really great technical person, Ted, who was doing a phenomenal job. Sam felt he was ready for a promotion and moved him to a supervisor role with the support of his boss, the VP of the business unit and with the support of HR. Ted’s new role would be overseeing the technical group in that particular business unit. However, Ted seemed to be having difficulty adjusting to his new role. He was not able to get the group working together as a team, couldn’t manage the conflict that arose and the employees were beginning to complain that he just didn’t know what he was doing. In analyzing the situation further, a few things were apparent:
- Ted had never been in a supervisory role before – either at this company or at any other; he had always been an individual contributor. He never even led a component of a project.
- The team Ted was now supervising were his peers previously; many of them saw him as a “friend,” not a “manager.” He was having difficulty trying to oversee a group of individuals who were friends.
- Ted had exceptionally strong technical skills, but had no management skills – for example, he had never delivered a presentation, negotiated for something, managed a conflict, or been involved in a performance review or set goals/objectives. These are all skills he would need to be effective in his new role.
When I suggested that Sam talk to Ted and find out what he wanted, Sam was surprised by what he learned. Ted was happy in his role as an individual contributor – he loved what he was doing. He didn’t want to be in a supervisory role. He wasn’t comfortable managing others. It didn’t matter if the company provided him a mentor or sent him to training; he just wasn’t interested in a promotion. He was concerned about telling Sam that he wasn’t interested in moving up because he figured he might lose his job and doesn’t everyone want to move up in a company anyway? Wouldn’t it be odd if he didn’t want to?
We can’t say with certainty that training or a mentor would not have helped Ted. Maybe he would shine as a supervisor. However, it wouldn’t matter how much training the company provided Ted; this isn’t the role he wanted. He wanted to remain in his current role – where he did quite well and was an asset to the company. Possibly, had he been pushed into a supervisory role, he would have left the organization to go to another company and do the job he loved.
Outcome: Ted was moved back to his previous role and was quite happy. He continued to be very productive and an asset to the company. Someone they could rely on to get the job done without supervision.
Case Study 2
Anna, a VP of human resources for a manufacturing company noted that Joshua was an excellent employee. He had very strong technical skills and the few times he had led a major component of a project as a team lead he had done an excellent job – the individuals who were reporting to him for that part of the project seemed to like him and respected him, and the job got done on time and within budget. The same couldn’t be said for all the project teams. However, since he has been moved to a supervisory role, he seemed to be having difficulty managing his team of 5 people. Anna had been sure that Joshua was perfect for this role but she now doubted her decision to push to get him promoted. Was her judgment of Joshua that off? Anna believed that she was usually a great judge of individuals and their potential within the company. In looking further at the situation, here is what I learned:
- Joshua had done a great job managing a few small project teams because his technical skills were quite strong and the team relied on his expertise.
- Joshua was extremely interested in the supervisory role, but didn’t really have an idea of what was expected of him.
- Joshua had not been provided any coaching on what is expected of him as a supervisor. On Friday he was promoted and on Monday he was a supervisor.
- Joshua has never had any training in critical management-type skills
In talking with Joshua, he was pleased with his promotion. He always wanted to be in a leadership role and this supervisory position was a step in that direction. He just needed more support from the company to ensure he was ready for the role and could be effective as a supervisor within the company. He needed to know what was expected of him in such a role.
Outcome: Joshua was provided a mentor who had 5 years of experience within the company in a management role. He was also sent to a 5 day basic management skills training course that covered “Management 101”-type topics. The 5 day course was supported by access to a portal where Joshua was able to get guidance from other supervisors and from the instructor and also share his stories with the others. He took advantage of the portal for 6 months after the training ended. After one year in his new role, Joshua was settling in quite well and was effective as a supervisor.
Case Study 3
Beth has been working with a marketing firm for over 3 years since she graduated college with a BA in Marketing. She has been a team lead on a few projects that required support from her department and has taken the initiative on a couple of in-house projects that were unrelated to her role. She is definitely a team player and has done a great job on the projects she has worked on. Jim, the VP of customer experience (her boss), has recognized her hard work. He wants to promote her because he believes she can manage the customer experience group (3 individuals) quite effectively. When Jim spoke with HR, they were supportive of the promotion to a management role, but felt it was important to first provide Beth training to build her management skills.
The firm had an in-house management development program for new managers. It included training in the following skills:
- Coaching others
- Performance reviews and goal setting
- Team leadership skills
- Communication and presentation skills
- General supervisory skills (mainly focused on understanding the policies and procedures at the firm)
- Interviewing and selection skills
The program ran over a two week time period and participants were expected to do role playing and develop an action plan on how they will apply their skills after the program ended and they were in their new role. They were taken off the job for the entire two weeks to attend the program.
Jim caught up with the instructor after the first week of the program to see how it was going. He heard some interesting information:
- Beth was definitely putting herself into the training and really trying, but she just couldn’t seem to grasp the content
- Her role playing was not improving; again, not for lack of trying – her skills just didn’t seem to get any better no matter how hard she tried
Jim decided to get her a coach, someone in a management role (similar to the position she would be going into) within the firm who can help her build her skills. He approached his peer, Andrea, in the finance department and asked for help. Andrea was happy to help and suggested that Anna, a 3 year manager who went through the program and has had quite a few challenges to address would be a great fit. In short, Anna became Beth’s coach – someone Beth could brainstorm with, practice role playing, and answer any questions Beth had.
Toward the end of the second week of the program, Jim again asked the instructor for a progress report on Beth. There was not much improvement – again, she was working hard and really trying but was having quite a bit of difficulty. She certainly was capable, but was hesitant to take the lead and was easily pushed around by others. She seemed to be concerned about how to keep everyone happy and ensure that everyone liked her and felt her to be their friend. Jim decided to talk to Anna, Beth’s coach. Anna agreed with the instructor’s perception of Beth. She was a terrific person, but frankly probably was not yet ready to take on a management role where she may have to make some tough decisions.
Outcome: Jim talked to Beth. He praised her work ethic and her efforts for the firm. However, he felt that at this point she probably wasn’t quite ready for a management role within the firm and would work with her so that in a year or two she was prepared. Beth agreed. While she felt the 2 week training session was a great experience, she realized she really wasn’t ready to take on that kind of responsibility right now. It was definitely a role and responsibility she wanted at some point, but she realized she wasn’t ready for it yet. Anna was going to continue to be Beth’s coach and mentor to help Beth achieve her goals.
Summary
So where am I going with this? It is important for organizations to have a plan in place to move employees up through the ranks when they show promise. However, it is OK if employees do not want to move up. If these employees continue to contribute to the organization and are valuable, do they really need to move into a management role? I don’t think so. For those employees who do want to move up but who are not ready, that’s OK too. These individuals have promise – you saw something in them that made you want to promote them. Give them the support and encouragement they need to stay with the organization until they are ready. These are not employees you want to lose to another organization. The challenge is with those employees who are interested in a management role but do not have the skills to be in one. You will need to evaluate these employees further to determine the following:
- Can they obtain those skills through training and coaching? If so – and you have a position for them – help them out! Provide them what they need and a mentor to help guide them.
Or
- Are they just not suited for such a role? And if not, why not? Are they not a fit culturally? Do they not have the capacity to manage others? What path should they take? Can and should they stay in the organization if they are not a fit culturally? Why don’t they have the capacity to be a manager – is it a matter of “will” or “skill?” “Skill” can be addressed; “will” is much more difficult.
The age old question has always been – are leaders born or made? Maybe it is a little of both? They can be made, but they have to have some inherent skills to start with? Maybe every leader needs support – whether through training, coaching or via a mentor. Your thoughts? (I know this is a loaded question – have at it folks!)
Next post: Developing a Leadership Training Program for High Potentials
i like your notes. thanks
[…] via Gina Abudi | Is Every Employee Suited for a Management Role?. […]
Hi Jody,
Thanks for your comment. Depending on what you mean by “acting like a leader” – I’m not sure that it is a bad thing for schools to teach leadership skills. For instance, it is good if everyone in the organization thinks of the good of the company regardless of their particular role – what benefits the organization as a whole and how do we work together to achive the goals of the organization – again, thinking of how your particular role fits in the organization to ensure the success of the organization. Everyone in the organization should understand the short- and long-term goals of the organization. You could label that as “leadership.” I do believe that everyone can “act” like a leader in some way. However, maybe we don’t expect everyone to know how to create a strategic plan or set a strategic vision for the organization.
Individuals who are leaders can easily get people to follow them – you don’t have to be born a leader. It is your enthusiasm, your ability to set a vision for others that they can understand, and rolling up your sleeves to pitch in to get the job done rather than just throwing out orders that makes you a leader. Leaders can easily describe what everyone’s role is and how their role is needed to support the organization – to help individuals see their value within the organization.
I have seen groups as you have described – where everyone wants to lead and there is no real “team” working together toward a goal. Frankly, I have found in most all those cases that the issue is the team has no real leadership – no one who can effectively guide and facilitate the team and ensure consensus and cooperation. There may be an assigned “leader” – but maybe not someone who can demonstrate true leadership skills to make the group feel comfortable following them.
Thanks for your comment! You have certainly provided food for thought!
Best regards,
Gina
Over my working career I have seen people promoted to management that probably should not have been. The excuse was usually something like: we can’t pay you any more, you are at the top of pay scale for your position. The only way you can make more money is by becoming a manager.
Also, I know that leadership skills are taught in school these days. However, how many people really can be leaders? If the goal is just to be able to recognize a leader, then fine. But when everyone is told they “must” act like a leader, what message does that send to those who simply cannot?
It brings up the old cliche: Too many chiefs and not enough Indians. I think “follower” skills need to be taught as well. Not to blindly follow, but to develop the mindset of someone skilled in carrying out reasonable instructions and work, maybe with less supervision than before. They would need to learn to recognize when those instructions were not reasonable and challenge them intelligently and effectively. But when everyone thinks they are supposed to lead we often get an organization that is paralyzed because everyone has their own idea of how to proceed and is intent on having their instructions implemented over others. If their idea was not followed, instead of saying OK, your way makes sense too and I can do it that way, they begin to stir the pot and cause a negative work environment because all they can do is complain that their way was better and would bring it up every time the favored idea developed a problem.
Has anyone else experienced being in a group with everyone thinking that their idea should be used and being poor followers if it is not? People who spend more time talking about how much better things would be if it had gone their way and second guessing or taking pleasure in apparent failures of the idea that came to be used?
Congratulations! This post was selected as one of the five best independent business blog posts of the week in my Three Star Leadership Midweek Review of the Business Blogs.
http://blog.threestarleadership.com/2009/08/26/82609-midweek-look-at-the-independent-business-blogs.aspx
Wally Bock
Hi Wally,
Thanks much for your comment. I have used these examples – and a few others – to have discussions with clients around such topics about promotions. Especially when there is some hesitancy around the promotion or lack of consensus.
Many times if an employee is just not suited for a management role – or frankly not interested – there are so many ways to keep that employee engaged. I have found that sometimes clients are worried about losing a good employee to the competition and promote to keep them in the company. This rarely works.
Again – thanks for your comment and for reading!
Best regards,
Gina
What a wonderful post, Gina. You’ve shared excellent examples of a variety of situations and highlighted key issues in the process. This can be a great resource for discussions about why and how we promote people.
Hi Fred,
First, great to hear from you! Hope you are well!
You have definitely made some excellent, valid points! I didn’t mean to imply that just because you are successful in a previous role that it doesn’t count – just that it doesn’t mean you don’t need further development and the organization doesn’t have to invest in you. It must for continued success in the new role.
Too frequently it takes a significant amount of work to justify the development program – esp one that includes continued support and mentoring – and get the appropriate monies allocated for it. I have been successful doing business impact and ROI studies based on pilot groups and therefore getting the additional monies to continue the program providing it shows a positive business impact. It isn’t easy though!
Thank you again!
Best,
Gina
Interesting subject as sometimes the leadership concept is very often driven by someone who is already in a leadership role within a corporation or institution. Possibly driven by someone who might say, “everyone MUST want to be like me!”. Developing leaders is a good thing but the remains of this process should not be cast aside as even being a candidate for leadership development there must have existed a glimmer of success in the current role. A balanced development regimen might be in order but is often difficult to justify to the holders of the development budgets.
Quote: “I don’t believe there comes a point where you say – “well…I’ve done it all….now I’m the best and never need to work at it again.” ”
– And still so many do. I have met people, not saying that they are the best, but saying that they are good enough… That is scary!
Hi Frode,
Great comment – thank you! Completely agree that to be a good leader you must work at it every day. I don’t believe there comes a point where you say – “well…I’ve done it all….now I’m the best and never need to work at it again.” There is always a new challenge in front of you and let’s face it, people who will challenge you in general! I love your point about not picking leaders based on what they have done in the past! Excellent point here. Obviously you might see the past as an indication of the type of person they are; but just because they succeed at a current job absolutely does not mean they can succeed as a leader.
Thanks again for your comment – a wonderful addition to this post!
Best regards,
Gina
Great post Gina.
I am not a born leader. I never felt that I had natural authority. But I learn and I study. I am aware of how I practice. If I fail, I will know why, I did not just have a bad day.
I believe that to become a leader you must want to be one for the right reasons. You must want to make other people grow, you must want to make results and you must want to practice.
You can say you want to become a leader, you might say you want to run in the olympics, if you do not practice you will fail at both.
I like to compare with soccer. A good soccer team practice five to ten times a week, and play once. A great company play five days a week and practice ??? twice a year?
You can spot leadership potential by talking with them about who they admire. But you need to ask why they admire, and then find the skill or quality that repeats itself. In that way you will know who can be coached to become a leader by the qualities they admire and their ambitions.
And stop picking leaders based on what they have done in the past… Yeez is it so hard to see that they will not be doing that in the future if they become leaders? It holds no relevance. You must find people that can deal with the task they are set to do in the future.
And when it comes to my natural authority I suddenly stumbled upon it as I was providing feedback to a new employee that almost had a nervous breakdown. I had never experienced people being scared of talking to me. I had respect and I needed to change my way to not scare of the rest also. I practice leadership everyday and that is why I could one day feel that I had respect and natural authority. It was a strange discovery for a person that was not born a leader.
🙂