As defined by Wikipedia, facilitation “concerns itself with all the tasks needed to run a productive and impartial meeting.” Facilitation is key to ensure productive meetings and it takes someone skilled to be an effective facilitator.
The facilitator’s role in meeting management includes, but is not limited to:
|
|
The main goal of the facilitator is to manage the process of the meeting, not the content of the meeting, to ensure the individuals are able to make decisions and reach a goal. The facilitator is there to ensure that the meeting is productive.
A facilitator may be used for a variety of reasons – not every meeting necessarily needs a facilitator at the helm, although, without a doubt, every meeting needs to be managed. You may call in a facilitator for various reasons, including:
|
|
Summary
For key meetings, include a facilitator to lessen frustrations among participants and increase participation. A neutral facilitator keeps the individuals and the meeting on track – thereby making it easier to accomplish the goals of the meeting.
QUESTION: How have you successfully facilitated meetings? Have you been part of meetings that have been facilitated? What were the pros/cons? How did it work out?
Please share your thoughts in the Comment field below.
Thanks!
Resource
This resource is a great handy reference guide to facilitation! It has everything you need to successfully facilitate your next meeting:
Facilitation at a Glance! A Pocket Guide to Tools and Techniques for Effective Meeting Facilitation
Author: Ingrid Bens,
Publisher: Goal/QPC and AQP
Dear Gina, thank you for your very comprehensive answer. I expected it wasn’t black or white. In the case of a project manager he is the main person who carries the project goals in mind, that way he should also run his meetings. And under the special circumstances, when hiring the external facilitator, I guess they would need to do intense preparation before the meeting.
Best regards,
Primoz
Hi,
Thanks for your comment. An excellent question! I don’t think it’s black and white. I think PMs should be able to facilitate their own meetings much of the time. If they aren’t good at it – it is definitely a skill they want to improve. On the other hand, I can see the benefit of hiring a professional facilitator for a meeting that will be contentious and full of conflict, or, possibly in the case of a large meeting to work toward, for example, a strategic plan or to solve a problem to move the project forward. I have attended meetings where the entire meeting is facilitated (by a professional facilitator) just to keep everyone on track and moving along – they do a great job in getting all attendees involved and reaching consensus.
Of course, hiring a professional is likely not inexpensive, so you might choose to hire one only in special circumstances.
Many thanks again for your comment!
Best regards,
Gina
Hello and thanks. The PM should be an allround facilitator, project-wise, meeting-wise.. So the question is: should we hire or appoint someone else to facilitate meetings?